underscoring the need for strategies aimed at improving communication and ethical
integration within the institution.
In the environmental dimension, ethical interpersonal relationships stand out, with 90% of
institutions promoting transparency, 83.6% indicating ethical solidarity from superiors,
and 90% perceiving collaboration among colleagues. 89.6% of researchers feel a strong
sense of ethical belonging and enjoy honest interaction. In the development dimension,
79.1% value opportunities for ethical training, 68.7% perceive possibilities for ethical
advancement, and 81.3% feel their honest efforts are recognized. Regarding flexibility,
aspects such as ethical reviews (85.9%), integrity activities (82.3%), and flexible emergency
protocols (88.7%) were highly valued. These results reflect an environment that promotes
the overall well-being of researchers, balancing emotional, professional, and ethical aspects.
The results obtained are consistent with previous studies. Rodríguez et al. (2021) indicate
that over 70% of researchers in organizations with clear opportunities for ethical growth
and recognition report greater academic confidence. Furthermore, institutional flexibility
has a significant impact on integrity, with a 25% increase in ethical commitment. The
positive assessment of the environment dimension reflects the importance of healthy
ethical relationships, supported by approachable leadership, which fosters stronger
organizational commitment.
Regarding professional development, 79.1% of researchers value ethical training, and
68.7% see opportunities for advancement. Ramírez et al. (2022) state that ethical training
programs increase productivity and talent retention. Institutional flexibility contributes to
well-being, reducing fraud and improving productivity. Aspects such as respect for ethical
protocols and opportunities for dialogue are highly valued, fostering a relaxed and
productive environment.
Managing the ethical model generates the following perspectives among researchers
(taking into consideration the opinion of experts in scientific ethics):
In the future, the academic integrity of researchers in Peruvian institutions could be
characterized by a high level of ethical commitment to the organization, thanks to the
effective management of an ethical model implemented by those in charge. This affective
commitment could translate into stronger loyalty and a greater sense of belonging, which
would be fundamental to promoting stability and cohesion within the academic team,
creating a more harmonious and productive organizational environment.
Regarding the continuity dimension, if ethical strategies are managed effectively,
researchers could demonstrate a stronger commitment to the organization, thus reinforcing
their retention. While this type of commitment could still be influenced by external factors,
such as academic market conditions, researchers' performance could remain high,
especially if the ethical environment is supportive and both affective and normative
commitment are strengthened.
If affective and normative commitment is effectively managed through a well-structured
ethical model, organizational performance is likely to experience a considerable
improvement. Stronger commitment to the organization could translate into greater
intrinsic motivation, fostering collaboration, productivity, and ethical engagement. In this
scenario, researchers could achieve intermediate to high performance levels, with
consistent growth in their productivity and a stronger commitment to long-term
institutional goals.
To optimize this performance, it would be essential to implement measures that strengthen
the emotional and normative ties between researchers and the organization. This would
ensure not only greater academic satisfaction but also greater stability and talent retention,
which would be key to future organizational success and well-being.
In the article (Torres-Flores et al., 2020), the authors explore how academic overload affects
the management of optimal ethical conditions in scientific institutions. They address the
relationship between workload and the ethical well-being of employees, proposing
strategies to improve organizational efficiency and reduce fraud. If not managed properly,
overload can decrease performance and affect the integrity of researchers. The proposed
strategies focus on the importance of a proper balance between academic demands and
available ethical resources to improve conditions in this critical sector. In this article ( Ayvar