and, in turn, measure the effectiveness of the improvements implemented, following a pre- and
post-measurement approach. This sheet collects data for each day of the week based on the
completion of activities and the areas to be collected from the process. Similarly, the "Activity
Time Record Sheet" is used. According to Kagan (2025), time records rigorously inspect activities
and their duration to gain insight into the phenomenon being studied. This instrument collects
data for each day of the week, based on the time spent completing each activity. The results for
this objective, demonstrating the state of effectiveness and efficiency measured in the first six
weeks observed before the implementation of GxP , are 84.44% and 93.6% respectively, yielding
an effectiveness of 79.05%, showing room for improvement. This is due to non-standardized
processes, empirical work, lack of communication, and insufficient supervision. This relates to
the research of Romero Sánchez (2024 ), who mentions that before implementing his GxP , 93%
of the Sub-Management's files were processed, a value similar to the pre-implementation
effectiveness obtained (90.45%). Furthermore, the delay rate was 31%, a much lower value than
that obtained in the time-based efficiency section. According to Martins (2025), efficiency, in
short, is completing objectives optimally—that is, doing so faster, using fewer resources, and
essentially achieving more with less. On the other hand, George et al. (2022) define effectiveness
as the ability to complete objectives appropriately. It involves achieving the expected results in
relation to the proposed goals. Finally, the same author defines efficacy as the actual impact of
an action, linking the stated objectives with the results obtained. Furthermore, he mentions that
it goes beyond efficacy because it not only measures goal achievement but also the benefits and
consequences it generates for the population. Regarding the results obtained, it can be deduced
that before implementing process management, the efficacy and efficiency were 84.44% and
93.6%, respectively, and the effectiveness was 79.05%, meaning that the proposed goals and
timelines were not being met, resulting in ineffective service to the population. This only
confirms that the lack of defined roles and a visual representation of the tasks to be performed
confuses workers, preventing them from working efficiently. Regarding the third objective,
designing and implementing Process Management (PM) after addressing the problems is a
priority, since the empirical approach used has only hindered optimal execution, causing delays
and a lack of completion of tasks. Therefore , the implementation of Process Management in the
Environmental Sub-Management allowed for the standardization of the activities in the
collection and recovery process of inorganic solid waste, beginning with process diagramming,
in order to systematically visualize the activities performed by the operators. Similarly, mapping
collection zones allows for visualizing the points where workers collect on different days. This
allows workers to have a better understanding of their daily tasks and avoid skipping any
activities. However, due to the constant complaints and repetitive tasks observed, the process
flowchart needs optimization. Brainstorming was used to gather all the suggestions and
complaints expressed by the operators, leading to the identification of the most critical ones
using the Ishikawa and Pareto diagrams. This resulted in the elimination of 5 of the 25 previously
identified activities, thus reducing those that did not add value to the process. This translates
into better organization, increased efficiency, and a reduction in unproductive time. Thanks to
the training provided to the operators, this improvement is reflected in effectiveness and
efficiency rates of 99.2% and 100.05%, respectively, achieving an overall effectiveness of
99.25%. This relates to what Carrasco (2025) mentions: process management helps
organizations model, analyze, design, implement, monitor, and continuously improve their
processes from start to finish, fostering a culture of effectiveness. This aligns with the present
research, as it allows the Environmental Sub-Management to design, implement, and monitor its
processes from beginning to end. The creation and optimization of process diagrams helped
solve the problems addressed in objective two. Similarly, sharing the diagrams with operational
staff, along with continuous control and improvement, are aspects related to what Vinodh et al.
(2021) stated. Likewise, Alarcón et al. (2023) state that applying Process Management (PM)
encourages active employee participation, clarifies responsibilities, and promotes transparency
in the entity's operations. It also minimizes time and costs in the process stage, resulting in the