Quality in ophthalmological patient care: A key strategy to combat visual impairment
[e-2506]: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15864637
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15864637Keywords:
quality; eye care; primary health care.Abstract
This article highlights the importance of ensuring quality in ophthalmologic care from Primary Health Care (PHC) as a key strategy to prevent visual impairment.Objective: To strengthen early detection of visual impairment through comprehensive patient-centered care. Methodology: Theoretical approach to three dimensions of quality: technical, interpersonal and management. Results: PHC should implement continuous training, telemedicine and articulation between levels of care. It is proposed to train first contact personnel for basic visual evaluations. Conclusion: Investing in quality reduces inequalities and improves quality of life through organizational and educational strategies and intersectoral alliances. Contribution: To propose improvements in access, equity and efficiency in visual health from primary care.
References
Ávalos-García, M. I. (2010). La evaluación de la calidad en la atención primaria a la salud. Consideraciones teóricas y metodológicas (Quality assessment in primary health care. Theoretical and methodological considerations) Horizonte Sanitario, 9(1), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.19136/hs.a9n1.158
Campbell, S. M., et al. (2000). Defining quality of care. Social Science & Medicine, 51(5), 1611–1625. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00057-5
Carnota, O. (2005). Tecnologías gerenciales: una oportunidad para los sistemas de salud (Management technologies: an opportunity for health systems) (p. 242). Universidad de Panamá.
Chow Mak, L. (2005). La calidad total como estrategia de competitividad para las empresas mexicanas. Parte 6. Los gurús de la calidad total (Total quality as a competitiveness strategy for Mexican companies) Part 6. The gurus of total quality. Baja California Institute of Technology.
Conferencia Internacional de Atención Primaria de Salud (International Conference on Primary Health Care) (1978). Alma-Ata, URSS, septiembre 1978. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/39244
Eman Abukmail, Bakhit, M., & Hoffmann, T. C. (2024). Exploring individuals’ perceptions and acceptability of a ‘wait and see’ approach for managing self-limiting illnesses: A qualitative study. Patient Education and Counseling, 118, 108032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2023.108032
Gulliford, M., Naithani, S., & Morgan, M. (2006). What’s “continuity of care”? Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 11(4), 248–250. https://doi.org/10.1258/135581906778476490
Hogg, W., et al. (2007). Framework for primary care organizations: the importance of a structural domain. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 20(5), 308–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.10.004
Olivera, A. T. (2013). La gestión por procesos asistenciales integrales: una estrategia necesaria (Comprehensive care process management: a necessary strategy. Primary C). Atención primaria, 31(9), 561.
Ortún, V. (2005). De la evaluación a la gestión: acortar la brecha entre eficacia y efectividad (From evaluation to management: bridging the gap between efficiency and effectiveness). Ekonomiaz, 1(60), 58–75. https://ideas.repec.org/s/ekz/ekonoz.html
Sackett, D. L., et al. (1996). Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ, 312(7023), 71–72. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71
Stiggelbout, A. M., Pieterse, A. H., & De Haes, J. C. (2015). Shared decision making: Concepts, evidence, and practice. Patient Education and Counseling, 98(10), 1172–1179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2015.06.022
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2025-07-14 (4)
- 2025-07-06 (3)
- 2025-07-06 (2)
- 2025-07-14 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Blanca Ivonné Salinas-Escudero, María Isabel Avalos-García, Heberto Romeo Priego-Álvarez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
